<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gibson Creates Signature Jimi Hendrix Strat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myrareguitars.com/gibson-creates-signature-jimi-hendrix-strat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myrareguitars.com/gibson-creates-signature-jimi-hendrix-strat</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: StratKat</title>
		<link>http://www.myrareguitars.com/gibson-creates-signature-jimi-hendrix-strat#comment-131615</link>
		<dc:creator>StratKat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myrareguitars.com/?p=917#comment-131615</guid>
		<description>This is an amazingly bold move by Gibson.  The danger of infringement is extremely real.  Generally speaking, a manufacture may create a similar product as another as long as the product does not create confusion within the general public.  Since Hendrix is most associated with the Fender Stratocaster--an instrument quite different than Gibsons he was known to play--one can only assume that Gibson is trying to exploit the Fender name and is attempting to &quot;fool&quot; the public with that association.  In my opinion, this product is in poor taste and blatant patent infringement.  That it is an &quot;entry-level&quot; guitar is a further black eye to Fender.

I&#039;m stunned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an amazingly bold move by Gibson.  The danger of infringement is extremely real.  Generally speaking, a manufacture may create a similar product as another as long as the product does not create confusion within the general public.  Since Hendrix is most associated with the Fender Stratocaster&#8211;an instrument quite different than Gibsons he was known to play&#8211;one can only assume that Gibson is trying to exploit the Fender name and is attempting to &#8220;fool&#8221; the public with that association.  In my opinion, this product is in poor taste and blatant patent infringement.  That it is an &#8220;entry-level&#8221; guitar is a further black eye to Fender.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m stunned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

